Current:Home > NewsArkansas court orders state to count signatures collected by volunteers for abortion-rights measure -Secure Growth Academy
Arkansas court orders state to count signatures collected by volunteers for abortion-rights measure
View
Date:2025-04-24 23:44:09
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court on Tuesday night ordered the state to begin counting signatures submitted in favor of putting an abortion-rights measure on the ballot — but only ones collected by volunteers for the proposal’s campaign.
The one-page order from the majority-conservative court left uncertainty about the future of the proposed ballot measure. Justices stopped short of ruling on whether to allow a lawsuit challenging the state’s rejection of petitions for the measure to go forward.
The court gave the state until 9 a.m. Monday to perform an initial count of the signatures from volunteers.
Election officials on July 10 said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding signature gatherers it hired.
The group disputed that assertion, saying the documents submitted complied with the law and that it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed. Arkansans for Limited Government sued over the rejection, and the state asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the lawsuit.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
“We are heartened by this outcome, which honors the constitutional rights of Arkansans to participate in direct democracy, the voices of 101,000 Arkansas voters who signed the petition, and the work of hundreds of volunteers across the state who poured themselves into this effort,” the group said in a statement Tuesday night.
Attorney General Tim Griffin said Wednesday morning he was pleased with the order.
“(Arkansans for Limited Government) failed to meet all legal requirements to have the signatures collected by paid canvassers counted, a failure for which they only have themselves to blame,” Griffin said in a statement.
The state has said that removing the signatures collected by paid canvassers would leave 87,382 from volunteers — nearly 3,000 short of the requirement.
According to the order, three justices on the majority-conservative court would have ordered the state to count and check the validity of all of the signatures submitted.
The proposed amendment if approved wouldn’t make abortion a constitutional right, but is seen as a test of support of abortion rights in a predominantly Republican state. Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would prohibit laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allow the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
veryGood! (289)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Rob Kardashian Makes Subtle Return to The Kardashians in Honor of Daughter Dream
- ‘Advanced’ Recycling of Plastic Using High Heat and Chemicals Is Costly and Environmentally Problematic, A New Government Study Finds
- Pittsburgh Selects Sustainable Startups Among a New Crop of Innovative Businesses
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Minnesota Is Poised to Pass an Ambitious 100 Percent Clean Energy Bill. Now About Those Incinerators…
- Scientists Examine Dangerous Global Warming ‘Accelerators’
- Outrage over man who desecrated Quran prompts protesters to set Swedish Embassy in Iraq on fire
- Average rate on 30
- Activists Make Final Appeal to Biden to Block Arctic Oil Project
Ranking
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- 20 Top-Rated Deals Under $25 From Amazon Prime Day 2023
- Why Lola Consuelos Is Happy to Be Living Back At Home With Mark Consuelos and Kelly Ripa After College
- Patrick Mahomes Is Throwing a Hail Mary to Fellow Parents of Toddlers
- Average rate on 30
- Rob Kardashian Makes Subtle Return to The Kardashians in Honor of Daughter Dream
- What Is Permitting Reform? Here’s a Primer on the Drive to Fast Track Energy Projects—Both Clean and Fossil Fuel
- ESPYS 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
A ‘Rights of Nature’ Fact-Finding Panel to Investigate Mexico’s Tren Maya Railroad for Possible Environmental Violations
Landowners Fear Injection of Fracking Waste Threatens Aquifers in West Texas
Logan Paul's Company Prime Defends Its Energy Drink Amid Backlash
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
When Will We Hit Peak Fossil Fuels? Maybe We Already Have
Ukrainian soldiers play soccer just miles from the front line as grueling counteroffensive continues
Six Environmental Justice Policy Fights to Watch in 2023